Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic

ChemEng stuff followers

Mass balance in a packed tower

This mass balance should applied to equipments provident a pseudo continuos mode of operation. For example: packed towers or bubble towers aimed for liquid-gas contact. The approach would be different if stagewise equipments are being used, such as: tray towers.

 

CONTENTS

 1 COUNTERCURRENT FLOW OPERATION

 1.1 A global mass balance on the soluble gas component

 1.1.1 The case of minimum water for an absorption operation

 1.2 A global mass balance for the operation of a packed tower

 1.2.1 Minimum liquid-gas ratio

 2 PARALLEL FLOW OPERATION


1 COUNTERCURRENT FLOW OPERATION

Go to the top

In the figure below, a general representation of a global mass balance for a packed tower allowing liquid-gas contact is presented.

Fig. 01 Global mass balance for an absorption packed tower. Notice that only ons souble gas component is of interest. All other components can not be separated at the working conditions.

Being only one soluble gas component in the mixture stream of our interest, only the mole fractions in the liquid and gas phase are symbolized.

1.1 A global mass balance on the soluble gas component

Go to the top

This can be easily formulated as,

G_1 y_1 \,+\, L_2 x_2\,=\, G_2 y_2\,+\, L_1x_1        Eq. (01)

where of course, if L_2 is clean water then, x_2=0 and Eq. (01) reduces to,

G_1 y_1 \,=\, G_2 y_2\,+\, L_1 x_1        Eq. (02)

1.1.1 The case of minimum water for an absorption operation

Go to the top

In this case, the minimum of water L_S to be used would be that carrying the maximum mole fraction x_1 separated from the inlet gas mixture stream G_1. One further typical assumption, is that the dilution of the gas component molecules of the gas mixture achieve equilibrium so that diagram of equilibrium become handy at this stage.

Please, read post: Equilibrum diagrams from gas component solubility data, for more details.

Therefore, Eq. (02) can be rewritten as,

G_1 y_1\,=\,G_2y_2\,+\, L_{1-min}x_{1-max}        Eq. (03)

where the subscripts min and max have been introduced to indicate the minimum and maximum features of the enriched liquid stream L_1 and the mole fraction x_1. From L_{1-min}, the stream of minimum required clean water L_{1-min}' can be obtained as,

L_{1-min}'=L_{1-min}\left( 1-x_{1-max} \right)        Eq. (04)

Equation (04) has two unknowns L_{1-min} and x_{1-,max}. The maximum fraction x_{1-max} corresponds to the equilibrium and as such must be searched from an equilibrium diagram at the corresponding mole fraction y_1 in the gas mixture.

1.2 A global mass balance for the operation of a packed tower

Go to the top

The general approach to the mass balance as presented above is of interest but gives little insight about the operation of the tower. For this purpose a parameter needs to be introuced: the mole ratio X (in the liquid phase) and Y (in the gas phase), which are defined as,

X=\dfrac{x}{1-x}        Eq. (05a)

Y=\dfrac{y}{1-y}=\dfrac{p}{p_t-p}        Eq. (05b)

where p_t is the total pressure exerted on the gas mixture and p the partial pressure of the soluble gas component. As you can see the mole ratio is just the ratio of the fractions of soluble component to that of the carrying media (say, solvent). If the mole ratio X<1 there is more solvent than dilute gas component molecules in L, and viceversa for X>1. The same could be said about the Y mole ratio and the stream G.

Next, using the idea of the mole ratio the stream of solvent carrying gas and liquid can be defined as,

G_S=G\left( 1-y \right)=\dfrac{G}{1+Y}        Eq. (06a)

L_S=L\left( 1-x \right)=\dfrac{L}{1+X}        Eq. (06b)

From Eqs. (6a,6b) it is not hard to see that,

G_1y_1=G_S\,\dfrac{y_1}{1-y_1}=G_SY_1        Eq. (07a)

L_1x_1=L_S\,\dfrac{x_1}{1-x_1}=L_SX_1        Eq. (07b)

Next, returning to mass balance Eq. (01) another set of formulas can be forseen,

G_2y_2=G_S\,\dfrac{y_2}{1-y_2}=G_SY_2        Eq. (07c)

L_2x_2=L_S\,\dfrac{x_2}{1-x_2}=L_SX_2        Eq. (07d)

so that Eq. (01) can now be rewritten as,

G_S Y_1 \,+\, L_S X_1\,=\, G_S Y_2\,+\, L_SX_1        Eq. (08)

and after som rearrangement,

G_S\left(Y_1-Y_2\right)=L_S\left(X_1-X_2\right)        Eq. (09)

Let us now consider a section inside the tower where the mole fractions and the mole ratios are: xyX and Y, as shown in the sketch below.

Fig. 02 Global mass balance for an absorption packed tower.

Then Eq. (09) can be expressed as,

G_S\left(Y_1-Y\right)=L_S\left(X_1-X\right)        Eq. (10)

Eq. (10) is the same mass balance as in Eq. (09) but this is a more general represention of what occurs in every place of the equipment (from the bottom to the mid). Also, Eq. (10) is the equation, in its most general form, of a straight line. Let us rewrite Eq. (10) as follows,

\dfrac{L_S}{G_S}=\dfrac{Y_1-Y}{X_1-X}        Eq. (11)

Now, it is clear that L_S/G_S is the slope of a straight line also called the operating line.

Fig. 03 Operating line for a tower of absorption. Notice that the equilibrium curve is given in terms of the mole ratios rather than in terms of the mole fractions.

Notice that Eqs. (09-10) are both represented in the operating line in Fig. (03). One other interesting fact is that the operating line is only a straight line when represented in terms of the mole ratios.

1.2.1 Minimum liquid-gas ratio

Go to the top

Let us now extend the idea of the minimum solvent requirement to include the gas solvent as well. We may start with the ratio L_S/G_S.

The reason of looking for a minimum flow rate of liquid solvent is that:

  • the flow rate of gas mixture G_1,
  • the mole ratios Y_1 and Y_2 and
  • the mole ratio X_2;

can be easily set as constants or as a design parameters. You can adjust the flow rate G_1 with a valve; the mole ratios Y_1 and Y_2 are set as goal parameters to achieved in the packed tower; and if the liquid solvent L_S is clean X_2=0 or you can measure it before the liquid enters the tower. On the other hand, L_S can be changed. Let us dicuss a little more on this subject.

Fig. 04 Operating lines for different flow rates of L_S.

Consider different operating lines ABAC and AD as presented in Fig. 04 corresponding to different scenarios in the packed tower corresponding to different L_S. As the flow rate L_S is decreased, the slope L_S/G_S decreases too, having in the operating line AB the minimum value for L_S, say L_{S-min}. For all these, operating conditions the absorption of the soluble gas component in G_1 is assured. However, the absorption at AB is easier than at AD just because the gradient driving it is reduced to its minimum. Therefore, for the absorption to work at conditions in AD a larger tower would be required or a larger residence time in it.

Also, if you wish a shorter packed tower a larger L_S is required. Then, a convinient operating line AC is desirable. Finally, the operating line AD touches the equilibrium curve at E where no gradient is present so that no molecules of soluble gas component are been absorbed so that the tower would have infinite height. As you can see, the operating line AD goes beyond E so that the absorptions process gets interrupted there.

How do we overcome the limit of a tower of infinite height? One way is by reducing Y_1 so that X_{1-max} ends at E producing a finite height packed tower.

2 PARALLEL FLOW OPERATION

Go to the top


This In a packed tower, working with the liquid and gas phases running in parallel, the calculations are barely the same but in the end an operating line of negative slope is obtained: -L_S/G_S. This would sound strange but there are applications for such conditions.

Fig. 05 Operating line for  packed tower working with parallel streams L_1 and G_1.


Again, the operating line may cut the equilibrium curve at the point X_e, Y_e where a packed tower of infinite height would be needed.

This is the end of thw post. I hope you find it useful.

Any question? Write in the comments and I shall try to help.

Other stuff of interest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Most popular posts